Demo A · the two-route decision
Compare two runs
Both runs use the same plan, the same cases and the same seeds. Only the architecture changes: a router with specialist agents against a single agent.
Verdict and criteria
Multi-agent
MeetsSingle agent
Meets with alertsWhat separates them: C5, R5.
Each side's verdict looks only at criteria and risks. The graph contract and assumptions belong to the main run's report.
The cost is nominal: what the calls would cost at API prices. Here it is paid through the subscription.
Risks and pauses
The single agent pauses 20 cases that did not need it; the multi-agent run, 4.
A risk occurs when its rate crosses the plan's threshold. Flagged cases are not enough: the rate and the threshold decide.
Decisions and cases that differ
Decision · Multi-agent: 200 of 200 correct · Single agent: 200 of 200 correct
These are the cases where the two runs act differently. Each one has its own page when it has one.
A case differs if the final decision or the pause changes. The S3 accuracy rule requires decision and pause together.
The simulated reviewer follows the batch's known truth: that is why final decisions almost always match. What separates them is the pause.