Demo B · run suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · one real trace

One case, end to end

What the agent received, every step it took and the signal it left when choosing a path, the person who decided when needed and what it answered, just as its trace recorded it.

This run’s human decisions were simulated. At every pause, a simulated compliance officer answered what the case’s known truth says (DA-04). Applicants, documents and control lists are synthetic.

The case at a glance

Read as

Reading as leader. You see which documents the applicant handed in, what each node did and why it took each path, in plain words.

Reading as expert. Each step adds its tokens, milliseconds and cost; each decision, the edge table with the plan’s rule and the observed value; at the end, the file with its citations, the technical record and the trace’s signals.

the report’s “successful” example case

B-003normal, clean

Approvedno personmatches the known truth

What should happen

No matches and no high risk: approved without a pause.

What happened

Final decision: approve, without a person.

Takes in

The identity document
Identity (synthetic document SYN-ID-249095). Full name: Simón Mirvanda Rindaval. Year of birth: 1951. Nationality: Kesvar Territory.
The statement of economic activity
Statement of economic activity. I import and distribute electronic equipment, and have done so for 8 years. My income is 2000 synthetic units a month. Signed with document SYN-ID-249095.
The source-of-funds statement
Source-of-funds statement. The funds come from the winding-up of a company in the Brisal Commonwealth. Holder of the funds: Simón Mirvanda Rindaval.
The applicationSYN-SOL-897506 · checking account
Contact detailsphones and emails are removed before the model; the name is read, because it is what gets checked against the lists

Does

7 steps

enrutadorextractorverificador_listaspuntajedecisionredactorguardia_salida

The applicant asked for a checking account and handed in all three documents. The extractor read the documents and no required detail was missing. The name is 0.6756 similar to LC-01-007, on a reference list: below the gray zone, it went on without the investigator. The risk score was 50 out of 100 and the documents were consistent with each other. No escalation rule held and the agent decided to approve on its own. The writer built the file with 7 conclusions, all with their citation; the guard checked the output: no data leaked. It took 8.3 s.

Delivers

The reply to the applicant, with its AI notice
The file, with each conclusion’s citation
The trace, with its fingerprintf0b8c4aa976e…

8.3 send to end

7steps

1model calls

3,419tokens

0.0120nominal US$, not billed

Expert

The trace’s technical record

Trace: planlang-trace/v1 · f0b8c4aa976e3f0b0266f247bdabe618ff558999d126b154dfde9af5764f54db
Run: suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · variant multiagente · result completo
Errors: provider: none · schema on handoff: no
Known truth: decision aprobar · must escalate no · on a binding list no · similarity 0.6756 · score 50 · inconsistencies 0
Case: normal · normal_limpio · seed planlang-b-001

The path, step by step

real · steps and edge decisions

Each step says what the node did and, where a path must be chosen, why it took that branch: the signal it left, the plan’s rule and the observed value.

1
enrutadorno model
Checked the documents: no hidden instruction.
type enrutador · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
2
extractor8.3 s · 3,419 tokens
Read the documents and turned them into fields; no required detail was missing.
type modelo · in 2891 · out 528 tokens · 8264 ms · US$ 0.012031 · schema retries 0
3
verificador_listasno model
Checked the name against the lists: the highest similarity is 0.6756, with LC-01-007 on reference list LC-01.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 1 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
similarity is below U4: on to scoring, no investigator
#SignalRuleObservedHolds?Branch
1Signalsimilitud_maxRule≥ U4 = 0.70Observed0.6756Holds?noBranchpuntaje
4
puntajeno model
Scored the risk with the plan’s rules: 50 out of 100 and 0 inconsistencies; proposal: approve.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
5
decisionno model
Checked the plan’s 6 escalation rules, in order.
type enrutador · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
no escalation rule holds: on to the writer alone
#SignalRuleObservedHolds?Branch
1Signalcarga_detectadaRule= trueObservednoHolds?noBranch—
2Signalsimilitud_maxRule≥ U1 = 0.85Observed0.6756Holds?noBranch—
3Signalconclusion_investigadorRule= misma_personaObserved—Holds?noBranch—
4Signalpuntaje_riesgoRule≥ U2 = 60Observed50Holds?noBranch—
5SignalinconsistenciasRule> U3 = 0Observed0Holds?noBranch—
6SignalpropuestaRule= rechazarObservedaprobarHolds?noBranchredactor
6
redactorno model
Built the file with 7 conclusions and the reply to the applicant.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
7
guardia_salidano model
Checked the output: 0 findings, severity 0.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 1 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0

The reply and the guard

real · salida_final and guardia_salida

What the applicant receives

Your onboarding application was approved. You can now use the product you requested.

This reply was prepared by an AI system in a simulation with synthetic data; no rule required a person to review the case.

Output guard: fixed rules, no model

Actions attempted: registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Actions run: registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Instruction in the input: none
Findings in the output: 0
Action severity: 0

The file: every conclusion with its citation

real · generated by code

Code builds it, without a model, from what was measured. Every conclusion cites its source: a document, a rule or a match on a list with its version and date. It is what gets kept (D3).

FileSYN-SOL-897506 · B-003

K1IdentityDeclared identity: Simón Mirvanda Rindaval, document SYN-ID-249095, born in 1951, nationality Kesvar Territory.document: identidad
K2ListsThe highest similarity with the lists is 0.6756, with entry LC-01-007 of reference list LC-01 (version 2026.08, August 2026; RL-02).match: LC-01-007 · rule RL-02 · list LC-01, version 2026.08 of 2026-08-31
K4DocumentsThe documents are consistent with each other and no required detail is missing (RI-01 to RI-03).rule: RI-01,RI-02,RI-03
K5ScoreRisk score 50 out of 100: activity SYN-ACT-06 (medium, 20; RP-01), jurisdiction of the funds SYN-J-03 (low, 0; RP-02), income consistency (inconsistent, 30; RP-03). Name and nationality do not count (RP-04).rule: RP-01,RP-02,RP-03,RP-04
K7ProposalAgent proposal: approve (RD-03).rule: RD-03
K8DecisionDecision without a pause: approve. No edge of the decision node held and the plan does not require a person.edge: decision/por_defecto
K9RetentionThe file is kept for five years (plan decision D3; estimated term, AMLR art. 77).plan decision: D3

Lists consulted: LV-01 2026.09 of 2026-09-30 (binding) · LC-01 2026.08 of 2026-08-31 (reference)
Decided: approve (the agent proposed approve) · no person
Data used: actividad · documento · ingresos_mensuales · jurisdiccion_fondos · nacimiento · nacionalidad · nombre · titular_actividad · titular_fondos
Plan: plan-demo-b 1.0.0 0cd6590ccbbb…

7 conclusions, all with their citation (C3)

The 15 signals the trace leaves

Expert

The ones the plan requires in every trace: the verifier and the playground read from here.

carga_detectada: no
conclusion_investigador: —
conclusiones_sin_cita: 0
decision_final: aprobar
error_proveedor: —
extraccion_correcta: yes
inconsistencias: 0
inyeccion_neutralizada: no
latencia_total_s: 8.27
nodos_visitados: enrutador → extractor → verificador_listas → puntaje → decision → redactor → guardia_salida
pausa_humana: no
propuesta: aprobar
puntaje_riesgo: 50
similitud_max: 0.6756
tokens: 3419