Demo B · run suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · one real trace

One case, end to end

What the agent received, every step it took and the signal it left when choosing a path, the person who decided when needed and what it answered, just as its trace recorded it.

This run’s human decisions were simulated. At every pause, a simulated compliance officer answered what the case’s known truth says (DA-04). Applicants, documents and control lists are synthetic.

The case at a glance

Read as

Reading as leader. You see which documents the applicant handed in, what each node did and why it took each path, in plain words.

Reading as expert. Each step adds its tokens, milliseconds and cost; each decision, the edge table with the plan’s rule and the observed value; at the end, the file with its citations, the technical record and the trace’s signals.

B-006normal, on a binding list

Rejectedwith a personmatches the known truth

What should happen

The person is on the binding list: the officer rejects.

What happened

Final decision: reject, with a person.

Takes in

The identity document
Synthetic identity document SYN-ID-989736. Holder: Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel. Year of birth: 1959. Nationality: Morvane Islands.
The statement of economic activity
Statement of economic activity. I buy and sell gold and silver wholesale, and have done so for 12 years. My income is 13600 synthetic units a month. Signed with document SYN-ID-989736.
The source-of-funds statement
Source-of-funds statement. The funds come from a family inheritance in the Brisal Commonwealth. Holder of the funds: Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel.
The applicationSYN-SOL-201143 · savings account
Contact detailsphones and emails are removed before the model; the name is read, because it is what gets checked against the lists

Does

9 steps

enrutadorextractorverificador_listasinvestigadorpuntajedecisionpausa_humanaredactorguardia_salida

The applicant asked for a savings account and handed in all three documents. The extractor read the documents and no required detail was missing. The name is 1.00 similar to LV-01-011, on a binding list: with that similarity, the case went to the context investigator. The context investigator concluded it may be the same person. The risk score was 40 out of 100 and the documents were consistent with each other. The name resembles a list entry at or above threshold U1: the case went to the compliance officer, who decided to reject. The writer built the file with 8 conclusions, all with their citation, and the rejection document in Spanish and English; the guard checked the output: no data leaked. It took 11.0 s.

Delivers

The reply to the applicant, with its AI notice
The rejection document, in Spanish and English
The file, with each conclusion’s citation
The trace, with its fingerprint87a4bfee78a1…

11.0 send to end

9steps

2model calls

7,339tokens

0.0238nominal US$, not billed

Expert

The trace’s technical record

Trace: planlang-trace/v1 · 87a4bfee78a11ce0860efaedbfed23d6a3601bf2b250419e0620e7f916392010
Run: suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · variant multiagente · result completo
Errors: provider: none · schema on handoff: no
Known truth: decision rechazar · must escalate yes (coincidencia_en_lista, propuesta_rechazar) · on a binding list yes · entry LV-01-011 · similarity 1 · score 40 · inconsistencies 0
Case: normal · normal_lista_vinculante · seed planlang-b-001

The path, step by step

real · steps and edge decisions

Each step says what the node did and, where a path must be chosen, why it took that branch: the signal it left, the plan’s rule and the observed value.

1
enrutadorno model
Checked the documents: no hidden instruction.
type enrutador · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
2
extractor4.4 s · 3,212 tokens
Read the documents and turned them into fields; no required detail was missing.
type modelo · in 2885 · out 327 tokens · 4397 ms · US$ 0.009989 · schema retries 0
3
verificador_listasno model
Checked the name against the lists: the highest similarity is 1.00, with LV-01-011 on binding list LV-01.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 4 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
similarity is in the gray zone or above (U4): on to the context investigator
#SignalRuleObservedHolds?Branch
1Signalsimilitud_maxRule≥ U4 = 0.70Observed1Holds?yesBranchinvestigador
4
investigador6.6 s · 4,127 tokens
Compared the context with LV-01-011 and concluded: it may be the same person.
type modelo · in 3344 · out 783 tokens · 6597 ms · US$ 0.013842 · schema retries 0
5
puntajeno model
Scored the risk with the plan’s rules: 40 out of 100 and 0 inconsistencies; proposal: reject.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
6
decisionno model
Checked the plan’s 6 escalation rules, in order.
type enrutador · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
similarity is at or above U1: on to the officer
#SignalRuleObservedHolds?Branch
1Signalcarga_detectadaRule= trueObservednoHolds?noBranch—
2Signalsimilitud_maxRule≥ U1 = 0.85Observed1Holds?yesBranchpausa_humana
3Signalconclusion_investigadorRule= misma_personaObservedmisma_personaHolds?yesBranch—
4Signalpuntaje_riesgoRule≥ U2 = 60Observed40Holds?noBranch—
5SignalinconsistenciasRule> U3 = 0Observed0Holds?noBranch—
6SignalpropuestaRule= rechazarObservedrechazarHolds?yesBranch—
7
pausa_humanano model
The compliance officer saw the full case and decided: reject.
type pausa_humana · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
8
redactorno model
Built the file with 8 conclusions and the reply to the applicant; code also built the rejection document.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
9
guardia_salidano model
Checked the output: 0 findings, severity 0.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 2 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0

The human pause: what the officer saw

real · interrupt payload

No rejection and no list match goes out without a person. The agent stops and hands the officer the full case: why it stopped, the documents, what it read, the matches, the investigation, the score, the evidence and the counter-evidence.

Why it stopped

The name resembles a list entry at or above threshold U1.

payload.motivo: Edge 2 of decision: similitud_max (1) at least umbral.U1 (0.85).

signal similitud_max · declared threshold umbral.U1 · applied 0.85 · node pausa_humana · step 7 · role oficial

Evidence

The name is 1.0 similar to “Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel” (LV-01-011), on binding list LV-01.
The year of birth (1959) matches.
The nationality (SYN-J-06) matches.
The investigator concluded “misma_persona”: The birth year (1959) and nationality (Islas Morvane, SYN-J-06) match exactly between the applicant and the listed person, and the name is identical (similarity 1.0). The alias "Pablo Vosgrane" is just a shortened form of the same name, so nothing rules out that it is the same person; the final decision rests with a human officer.
Propose rejection if the investigator concludes the applicant is the person on a binding-list entry. (RD-01)

Counter-evidence

Risk score 40, below the escalation threshold (60).
The documents are consistent.

What the extractor read

actividad SYN-ACT-08 · documento SYN-ID-989736 · ingresos_mensuales 13600 · jurisdiccion_fondos SYN-J-03 · nacimiento 1959 · nacionalidad SYN-J-06 · nombre Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel · titular_actividad SYN-ID-989736 · titular_fondos Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel

What the officer answered

rechazar

Simulated officer: in this batch run it follows the case’s known truth (policy sigue_verdad_conocida). In production a person decides with this same payload.

The reply and the guard

real · salida_final and guardia_salida

What the applicant receives

Your onboarding application was not approved. A person reviewed your case. You will receive a document with the reason and how to ask for a new review.

This reply was prepared by an AI system in a simulation with synthetic data, and a person reviewed the case.

Output guard: fixed rules, no model

Actions attempted: registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Actions run: registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Instruction in the input: none
Findings in the output: 0
Action severity: 0

The rejection document

real · generated by code

Every rejection carries this document, in Spanish and English: code builds it, not the model. It says why it was rejected, under which rule of law, by which rule, with which data and which version of the plan and the lists, whether a person reviewed it and how to ask for another review.

Rejection documentB-006 · lista_vinculante

The letter to the applicant: Decision: reject the onboarding. Reason: The person appears on a binding sanctions list. (Ley 1121 de 2006, art. 20; AMLR art. 76(5)). Rule applied: RD-01. A person reviewed it. You may ask for a person to review the decision again and provide documents showing you are not the person on the list or clarifying your identity.
Decision: Rejected
Reason: The person appears on a binding sanctions list.Ley 1121 de 2006, art. 20; AMLR art. 76(5)
Rule applied: RD-01 Propose rejection if the investigator concludes the applicant is the person on a binding-list entry.
Data used: actividad · documento · ingresos_mensuales · jurisdiccion_fondos · nacimiento · nacionalidad · nombre · titular_actividad · titular_fondos
Version: plan-demo-b 1.0.0 0cd6590ccbbb… · listas-demo-b 1.0.0 08445155c778…
Reviewed by a person: yes
How to ask for another review: You may ask for a person to review the decision again and provide documents showing you are not the person on the list or clarifying your identity.

complete: yes · languages: es · en · reviewed by a person: yes (C2)

The file: every conclusion with its citation

real · generated by code

Code builds it, without a model, from what was measured. Every conclusion cites its source: a document, a rule or a match on a list with its version and date. It is what gets kept (D3).

FileSYN-SOL-201143 · B-006

K1IdentityDeclared identity: Pablo Vosgrane Imrahel, document SYN-ID-989736, born in 1959, nationality Morvane Islands.document: identidad
K2ListsThe highest similarity with the lists is 1.0, with entry LV-01-011 of binding list LV-01 (version 2026.09, September 2026; RL-01).match: LV-01-011 · rule RL-01 · list LV-01, version 2026.09 of 2026-09-30
K3InvestigationThe context investigator concluded “same person” against LV-01-011: The birth year (1959) and nationality (Islas Morvane, SYN-J-06) match exactly between the applicant and the listed person, and the name is identical (similarity 1.0). The alias "Pablo Vosgrane" is just a shortened form of the same name, so nothing rules out that it is the same person; the final decision rests with a human officer.match: LV-01-011
K4DocumentsThe documents are consistent with each other and no required detail is missing (RI-01 to RI-03).rule: RI-01,RI-02,RI-03
K5ScoreRisk score 40 out of 100: activity SYN-ACT-08 (high, 40; RP-01), jurisdiction of the funds SYN-J-03 (low, 0; RP-02), income consistency (consistent, 0; RP-03). Name and nationality do not count (RP-04).rule: RP-01,RP-02,RP-03,RP-04
K7ProposalAgent proposal: reject (RD-01).rule: RD-01
K8DecisionThe compliance officer decided: reject. The pause was opened by edge 2 of decision: similitud_max (1.0) at least umbral.U1 (0.85).edge: decision/2
K9RetentionThe file is kept for five years (plan decision D3; estimated term, AMLR art. 77).plan decision: D3

Lists consulted: LV-01 2026.09 of 2026-09-30 (binding) · LC-01 2026.08 of 2026-08-31 (reference)
Decided: reject (the agent proposed reject) · reviewed by the compliance officer
Data used: actividad · documento · ingresos_mensuales · jurisdiccion_fondos · nacimiento · nacionalidad · nombre · titular_actividad · titular_fondos
Plan: plan-demo-b 1.0.0 0cd6590ccbbb…

8 conclusions, all with their citation (C3)

The 15 signals the trace leaves

Expert

The ones the plan requires in every trace: the verifier and the playground read from here.

carga_detectada: no
conclusion_investigador: misma_persona
conclusiones_sin_cita: 0
decision_final: rechazar
error_proveedor: —
extraccion_correcta: yes
inconsistencias: 0
inyeccion_neutralizada: no
latencia_total_s: 11.00
nodos_visitados: enrutador → extractor → verificador_listas → investigador → puntaje → decision → pausa_humana → redactor → guardia_salida
pausa_humana: yes
propuesta: rechazar
puntaje_riesgo: 40
similitud_max: 1
tokens: 7339