Demo B · run suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · one real trace
One case, end to end
What the agent received, every step it took and the signal it left when choosing a path, the person who decided when needed and what it answered, just as its trace recorded it.
This run’s human decisions were simulated. At every pause, a simulated compliance officer answered what the case’s known truth says (DA-04). Applicants, documents and control lists are synthetic.
The case at a glance
Read as
Reading as leader. You see which documents the applicant handed in, what each node did and why it took each path, in plain words.
Reading as expert. Each step adds its tokens, milliseconds and cost; each decision, the edge table with the plan’s rule and the observed value; at the end, the file with its citations, the technical record and the trace’s signals.
B-008missing: no source of funds
Approvedwith a personmatches the known truth
What should happen
The source-of-funds statement is missing: the officer completes the file and approves.
What happened
Final decision: approve, with a person.
Takes in
The identity document
Identity (synthetic document SYN-ID-417872). Full name: Martín Quindral Lismaren. Year of birth: 1964. Nationality: Morvane Islands.
The statement of economic activity
Statement of economic activity. I import and distribute electronic equipment, and have done so for 9 years. My income is 2000 synthetic units a month. Signed with document SYN-ID-417872.
The applicationSYN-SOL-295900 · savings account
The source-of-funds statementnot handed in: RI-01 counts the missing detail
Contact detailsphones and emails are removed before the model; the name is read, because it is what gets checked against the lists
The applicant asked for a savings account and handed in two of the three documents: the source-of-funds one was missing. The extractor read the documents; one required detail was missing. The name is 0.6898 similar to LC-01-005, on a reference list: below the gray zone, it went on without the investigator. The risk score was 80 out of 100, with one inconsistency between the documents. The risk score reached the escalation threshold U2: the case went to the compliance officer, who decided to approve. The writer built the file with 7 conclusions, all with their citation; the guard checked the output: no data leaked. It took 7.6 s.
suscripcion-planlang-b-001-20 · variant multiagente · result completo
Errors
provider: none · schema on handoff: no
Known truth
decision aprobar · must escalate yes (puntaje_en_o_sobre_U2, inconsistencias_sobre_U3) · on a binding list no · similarity 0.6898 · score 80 · inconsistencies 1
Each step says what the node did and, where a path must be chosen, why it took that branch: the signal it left, the plan’s rule and the observed value.
1
enrutadorno model
Checked the documents: no hidden instruction.
type enrutador · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
2
extractor7.6 s · 3,298 tokens
Read the documents and turned them into fields; one required detail was missing.
type modelo · in 2823 · out 475 tokens · 7631 ms · US$ 0.011208 · schema retries 0
3
verificador_listasno model
Checked the name against the lists: the highest similarity is 0.6898, with LC-01-005 on reference list LC-01.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 1 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
similarity is below U4: on to scoring, no investigator
The compliance officer saw the full case and decided: approve.
type pausa_humana · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
7
redactorno model
Built the file with 7 conclusions and the reply to the applicant.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 0 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
8
guardia_salidano model
Checked the output: 0 findings, severity 0.
type regla · in 0 · out 0 tokens · 1 ms · US$ 0.000000 · schema retries 0
The human pause: what the officer saw
real · interrupt payload
No rejection and no list match goes out without a person. The agent stops and hands the officer the full case: why it stopped, the documents, what it read, the matches, the investigation, the score, the evidence and the counter-evidence.
Why it stopped
The risk score reached the escalation threshold U2.
payload.motivo: Edge 4 of decision: puntaje_riesgo (80) at least umbral.U2 (60).
signal puntaje_riesgo · declared threshold umbral.U2 · applied 60 · node pausa_humana · step 6 · role oficial
Evidence
The name is 0.6898 similar to “Ramiro Quertal Kelmiro” (LC-01-005), on reference list LC-01.
Risk score 80, at or above the escalation threshold (60).
jurisdiccion_fondos: A required detail is missing (name, document, year of birth, nationality, activity, income or jurisdiction of the funds): one inconsistency per detail. (RI-01)
Counter-evidence
A match on a reference list calls for enhanced due diligence by a person, not a rejection. (RL-04)
The year of birth (1964) is not the entry's (1970).
The nationality (SYN-J-06) is not the entry's (SYN-J-08).
Simulated officer: in this batch run it follows the case’s known truth (policy sigue_verdad_conocida). In production a person decides with this same payload.
The reply and the guard
real · salida_final and guardia_salida
What the applicant receives
Your onboarding application was approved. You can now use the product you requested.
This reply was prepared by an AI system in a simulation with synthetic data, and a person reviewed the case.
Output guard: fixed rules, no model
Actions attempted
registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Actions run
registrar_expedienteresponder_solicitante
Instruction in the input
none
Findings in the output
0
Action severity
0
The file: every conclusion with its citation
real · generated by code
Code builds it, without a model, from what was measured. Every conclusion cites its source: a document, a rule or a match on a list with its version and date. It is what gets kept (D3).
FileSYN-SOL-295900 · B-008
K1IdentityDeclared identity: Martín Quindral Lismaren, document SYN-ID-417872, born in 1964, nationality Morvane Islands.document: identidad
K2ListsThe highest similarity with the lists is 0.6898, with entry LC-01-005 of reference list LC-01 (version 2026.08, August 2026; RL-02).match: LC-01-005 · rule RL-02 · list LC-01, version 2026.08 of 2026-08-31
K4Documents1 document inconsistency: jurisdiction of the funds (RI-01).rule: RI-01
K5ScoreRisk score 80 out of 100: activity SYN-ACT-06 (medium, 20; RP-01), jurisdiction of the funds no data (no data, 30; RP-02), income consistency (inconsistent, 30; RP-03). Name and nationality do not count (RP-04).rule: RP-01,RP-02,RP-03,RP-04
K8DecisionThe compliance officer decided: approve. The pause was opened by edge 4 of decision: puntaje_riesgo (80) at least umbral.U2 (60).edge: decision/4
K9RetentionThe file is kept for five years (plan decision D3; estimated term, AMLR art. 77).plan decision: D3
Lists consulted
LV-01 2026.09 of 2026-09-30 (binding) · LC-01 2026.08 of 2026-08-31 (reference)
Decided
approve (the agent proposed approve) · reviewed by the compliance officer